I was curious about how many compounds are added to the data sources that are loaded into ChEMBL each year. This is an exploration around that theme, with a digression or two at the end, but no real conclusions
import time,random
import psycopg2
from __future__ import print_function
import pandas as pd
%pylab inline
%load_ext sql
Populating the interactive namespace from numpy and matplotlib
WARNING: pylab import has clobbered these variables: ['random'] `%matplotlib` prevents importing * from pylab and numpy
Start by pulling the number of new compounds appearing per year.
data = %sql postgresql://localhost/chembl_19 \
select miny as year,count(molregno) from \
(select molregno,min(year) as miny from compound_records join docs using (doc_id) where year>0 group by molregno) tmp \
group by miny order by miny desc;
df1 = data.DataFrame()
37 rows affected.
df1.head(10)
year | count | |
---|---|---|
0 | 2014 | 15131 |
1 | 2013 | 70429 |
2 | 2012 | 69407 |
3 | 2011 | 67026 |
4 | 2010 | 84525 |
5 | 2009 | 65118 |
6 | 2008 | 61158 |
7 | 2007 | 52060 |
8 | 2006 | 33837 |
9 | 2005 | 30778 |
Obviously 2014 isn't complete yet, so we should ignore that one.
How many documents per year show up?
data = %sql \
select year,count(doc_id) as cnt from docs where year>0 \
group by year order by year desc ;
df2 = data.DataFrame()
37 rows affected.
data=pd.merge(df1,df2)
data.rename(columns={'count':'molCount','cnt':'docCount'},inplace=True)
data.head(10)
year | molCount | docCount | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 2014 | 15131 | 895 |
1 | 2013 | 70429 | 4211 |
2 | 2012 | 69407 | 4174 |
3 | 2011 | 67026 | 4022 |
4 | 2010 | 84525 | 4599 |
5 | 2009 | 65118 | 4443 |
6 | 2008 | 61158 | 4063 |
7 | 2007 | 52060 | 3822 |
8 | 2006 | 33837 | 2132 |
9 | 2005 | 30778 | 2009 |
2010 was a big year.
Look at the general relationship between number of documents and number of compounds:
scatter(data['docCount'],data['molCount'])
_=xlabel('doc count')
_=ylabel('mol count')
That looks pretty linear; we can confirm that by looking at the ratio:
data['ratio']=data['molCount']/data['docCount']
scatter(data['year'],data['ratio'])
_=xlabel('year')
_=ylabel('mols / doc')
There's a clear early outlier, leave it out:
data2=data[data.year>=1980]
scatter(data2['year'],data2['ratio'])
_=xlabel('year')
_=ylabel('mols / doc')
<matplotlib.collections.PathCollection at 0x10b810950>
Looks like there was dip in the late 90s. Odd.
Compounds per paper
A more systematic look at the number of compounds appearing in each paper.
data = %sql postgresql://localhost/chembl_19 \
select count(molregno) numcmpds,doc_id from compound_records join docs using (doc_id) \
where doc_id>0 and year>1 group by doc_id
df1 = data.DataFrame()
57115 rows affected.
Let's ignore documents that have more than 200 compounds; they probably aren't SAR papers anyway:
smaller=df1[df1.numcmpds<200]
print(len(smaller))
_=hist(smaller['numcmpds'],bins=20,log=True)
57031
Papers per compound
Turn the question around and ask how many papers each compound appears in:
data = %sql postgresql://localhost/chembl_19 \
select count(doc_id) numdocs,molregno from compound_records join docs using (doc_id) \
where doc_id>0 and year>1 group by molregno order by numdocs desc
df1 = data.DataFrame()
874168 rows affected.
_=hist(df1['numdocs'],bins=20,log=True)
_=xlabel('num papers')
df1.head()
numdocs | molregno | |
---|---|---|
0 | 1142 | 78759 |
1 | 1049 | 241 |
2 | 763 | 6579 |
3 | 667 | 8062 |
4 | 618 | 8873 |
top 10 appearing molecules
data = %sql postgresql://localhost/chembl_19 \
select molregno,m as smiles,numdocs from ( \
select count(doc_id) numdocs,molregno from compound_records join docs using (doc_id) \
where doc_id>0 and year>1 group by molregno order by numdocs desc limit 10 \
) tmp join rdk.mols using (molregno)
df1 = data.DataFrame()
10 rows affected.
from rdkit import Chem
from rdkit.Chem import Draw
from rdkit.Chem.Draw import IPythonConsole
from rdkit.Chem import PandasTools
PandasTools.AddMoleculeColumnToFrame(df1,smilesCol='smiles')
PandasTools.FrameToGridImage(df1,legendsCol='numdocs')
df1
molregno | smiles | numdocs | ROMol | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 78759 | COc1cccc2c1C(=O)c1c(O)c3c(c(O)c1C2=O)C[C@@](O)(C(=O)CO)C[C@@H]3O[C@H]1C[C@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@H](C)O1 | 1142 | |
1 | 241 | O=C(O)c1cn(C2CC2)c2cc(N3CCNCC3)c(F)cc2c1=O | 1049 | |
2 | 6579 | CCN(CC)CCCC(C)Nc1ccnc2cc(Cl)ccc21 | 763 | |
3 | 8062 | CC(=O)O[C@@H]1C2=C(C)[C@@H](OC(=O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(=O)c3ccccc3)c3ccccc3)C[C@@](O)([C@@H](OC(=O)c3ccccc3)[C@@H]3[C@]4(OC(C)=O)CO[C@@H]4C[C@H](O)[C@@]3(C)C1=O)C2(C)C | 667 | |
4 | 8873 | C[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)C=CC=CC=CC=CC=CC=CC=C[C@H](O[C@@H]2O[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@H](N)[C@@H]2O)C[C@@H]2O[C@](O)(C[C@@H](O)C[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)C[C@@H](O)CC(=O)O[C@H]1C)C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(=O)O | 618 | |
5 | 173 | COc1ccc2c(c1)c(CC(=O)O)c(C)n2C(=O)c1ccc(Cl)cc1 | 596 | |
6 | 13758 | OC(Cn1cncn1)(Cn1cncn1)c1ccc(F)cc1F | 565 | |
7 | 305519 | CC1(C)S[C@@H]2[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](N)c3ccccc3)C(=O)N2[C@H]1C(=O)O | 545 | |
8 | 27307 | Cc1cn([C@H]2C[C@H](N=[N+]=[N-])[C@@H](CO)O2)c(=O)[nH]c1=O | 543 | |
9 | 365189 | CO[C@H]1C=CO[C@@]2(C)Oc3c(c4c(O)c(/C=N/N5CCN(C)CC5)c(c(O)c4c(O)c3C)NC(=O)C(C)=CC=C[C@H](C)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](OC(C)=O)[C@@H]1C)C2=O | 532 |
Let's look some of these popular compounds up via the NCI Resolver. I would use ChemSpider for this, but their API is overly painful to use for these simple tasks.
import requests
def lookup(x):
resp = requests.get('http://cactus.nci.nih.gov/chemical/structure/'+x+'%09/names')
return '|'.join([x for x in resp.content.split('\n') if x.find('USAN')>-1 or x.find('USP')>-1])
df1['names']=df1['smiles'].map(lookup)
df1.drop('smiles',1)
molregno | numdocs | ROMol | names | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 78759 | 1142 | Doxorubicin [USAN:BAN:INN]|Doxorubicin (USAN) | |
1 | 241 | 1049 | Ciprofloxacin (JAN/USP/INN)|Ciprofloxacin [USAN:BAN:INN] | |
2 | 6579 | 763 | Chloroquine (USP)|Chloroquine [USAN:BAN:INN] | |
3 | 8062 | 667 | Paclitaxel [USAN:BAN:INN] | |
4 | 8873 | 618 | ||
5 | 173 | 596 | USAN|Indomethacin [USAN:BAN]|Indomethacin (USP) | |
6 | 13758 | 565 | Fluconazole (JAN/USAN/INN)|Fluconazole [USAN:BAN:INN:JAN] | |
7 | 305519 | 545 | Ampicillin (USP/INN)|Ampicillin [USAN:BAN:INN:JAN] | |
8 | 27307 | 543 | Zidovudine [USAN:BAN:INN:JAN]|Zidovudine (JAN/USP/INN) | |
9 | 365189 | 532 |
I could look the missing two up in chemspider manually. Number 4 is Amphotericin B, and number 9 is Rifampicin. Definitely lots of antibiotics in that list.
No comments:
Post a Comment